Profiles in Alleged LDS Church of Satan Members: Craig and Susan Christensen
In the Family, the CS Family
Craig Christensen, candidate for District One City Council in Provo, is a named perpetrator within the Hamblin Victims’ Statements. His nieces Rachel, Eliza, and Katie Hamblin accused him and his wife Susan “Suki” Christensen of being members of the LDS Church of Satan who participated in their abuse. In fact, the Hamblin children alleged that both sides of their families held membership in the LDS Church of Satan across multiple generations, going back to at least their great grandfather Gerrit de Jong on their mother Roselle’s side, and possibly as far back as their great great granduncle Jacob Vernon Hamblin on their father David’s side.
The Hamblin girls wrote a chilling narrative about their parents being sexually tortured and abused by their grandparents, Robert L. Hamblin and June Adams Hamblin, along with Richard Lloyd Anderson and Carma de Jong Anderson. They accused their grandparents of molesting and abusing their parents David Lee Hamblin and Roselle Anderson, along with the siblings of their parents. The ritual abuse allegations made by Rachel, Eliza, and Katie Hamblin detailed abuse that extended to aunts, uncles, and in-laws, because the LDS Church of Satan’s families combined their bloodlines with those of other CS families.
The goal of intermarriage among CS families was to strengthen the spiritual power of the bloodlines, in order to produce new generations that would effectively carry the cause of the CS forward into the future. For the Hamblins and the Andersons, this was serious business: each family had raised their children within the CS to accept the ritual abuse and perpetrate ritual abuse upon others. Everything the CS families did was sublimated to the cause of their church, and their god, Lucifer.
The mythology of the CS decreed that Lucifer, not Christ, was the rightful heir of the birthright from Heavenly Father. Heavenly Father had overstayed his position, instead of handing that position down to his son Lucifer. Through chicanery, Jesus had managed to usurp Lucifer’s rightful position as heir and obtain his birthright. The CS sought to prepare for the inevitable final battle between the followers of Jesus and the followers of Lucifer, in order to prevail on Lucifer’s behalf and restore him to rulership. The followers of Jesus Christ would become the slaves of CS families, and those who were most loyal and effective in the battle to restore Lucifer would reap the rewards.
David Lee Hamblin and Roselle Anderson both believed that their family bloodlines were royalty within the CS. By combining those bloodlines, they would produce children who would serve as worthy heirs within the CS, and who would carry its mission forward into the future. Their families were deeply committed to the CS, with their brothers and sisters dutifully participating in the core ordinances of the CS. At the center of those ordinances was a sexual component, with every ordinance and meeting inevitably devolving into a sexual orgy or ritualized sexual act.
Children are not naturally inclined to sadism, and therefore the parents within the CS invoke “The Wisdom of Parents,” a proclamation of belief that gives parents unilateral control to raise their children within the CS as the parents see fit. Children are to accept the authority of their father, the Paterfamilias, without question or hesitation. The LDS teaches that parents should raise their children to know and obey the decrees of Heavenly Father in Ether 2:11 of the Book of Mormon, but nothing the Book of Mormon teaches has anything resembling application of LDS Church of Satan.
If Rachel Hamblin and her sisters were telling the truth, the children of the CS were conditioned from shortly after birth to accept sexual abuse, torture, and pain in order to prepare them to inflict the same on others. Rachel Hamblin and her sisters chronicled in horrifying detail the requirement of their parents to torture, mutilate, and sacrifice family pets to Satan.
Rachel Hamblin’s second Victim’s Statement details the sacrifice of the family cat, Angus. She had come home from school, and she was told that Angus had been hit by a car. She ran inside the house to see him, and Angus was bandaged up with a broken hind leg. She sat by the box Angus was laying in while she did her homework, but after dinner, her parents told her it was time to do a “Re-birth Ceremony.” Each year, the CS requires its members to rededicate themselves to Satan with a ceremony intended to prove their devotion. The ceremony involves an act of sacrifice, one that requires suspending empathy and compassion.
Rachel Hamblin’s did not want to sacrifice Angus, but her father took out his pocketknife and threatened to cut out her vocal cords and her tongue. Rachel’s role in her family was the Peacemaker, and within the CS, the Peacemaker’s job is total obedience and the mediation of conflicts between other CS individuals, with the ultimate goal of encouraging obedience to the CS and its tenets. Due to her resistance, Rachel Hamblin was violating the covenants she had been forced to make as a child by her parents. David Lee Hamblin looked his daughter in the eyes as he held a knife to her throat, and told her that if she didn’t comply and carry out the Rebirth Ceremony, he would call the Punisher.
Within the CS, the Punisher’s role was to carry out discipline on wayward CS members, and that discipline could extend to murder. David Lee Hamblin knew the importance of terror in coercion, because he had been raised within the CS by his parents Robert Lee and June Adams Hamblin. He knew the power of the LDS and its doctrines as a lifelong member of the LDS, and he knew how to corrupt those doctrines and their ordinances to his purposes as a CS member. He gave his terrified daughter Rachel as priesthood blessing, forcing her to perform oral sex on him while he gave the blessing.
David Hamblin had evolved a theory of parts during his work as a therapist, which consisted of his belief that defective or unwanted parts of a person’s psyche could be cut out through a combination of the priesthood power of the LDS, psychotherapy, and the ordinances of LDS Church of Satan. He wanted his daughter to name the parts that should be cut out of her and cast into Angus, her beloved cat, during the sacrifice. There was a brief respite between Hamblin’s oral sodomizing of his daughter and the inevitable, brutal rite that would follow.
At 3 a.m., Rachel followed her father up the stairs to the TV room in the family’s Provo home. Angus lay on a towel that was placed over a blue tarp on the floor. David and Roselle Hamblin ordered their daughter to undress, kneel down, and they began to pray about consecrating the torture and sacrifice of Angus for Rachel’s good. They ordered their daughter to hold up her left arm “to the square” at a ninety degree angle, and repeat words designed to cut off parts of her and place those parts into Angus. They then ordered Rachel to pick up the hammer and break Angus’s other hind leg. Rachel Hamblin began to cry, unable to carry out her parents’ orders.
David and Roselle Hamblin were enraged, screaming at their daughter and calling her weak and stupid. Rachel Hamblin eventually acquiesced to her parents’ demands, hitting her beloved cat with the hammer repeatedly, and then cutting off the tips of his ears. From there, Rachel Hamblin was ordered to hit Angus’s forelegs with the hammer, cut off his whiskers and pull them out with tweezers, break the bones in his tail, and punch him in the side.
The ordinance culminated with an order from David Lee Hamblin to his daughter to kill Angus by “beat[ing] his head in.” Roselle Hamblin rolled over onto her side and began masturbating. Rachel Hamblin found herself unable to comply with her father’s orders, and David Hamblin once again held a knife to her throat while she cried hysterically. Hamblin forced his daughter onto her back, and then pushed his penis into her mouth, down to her throat, choking her. When he climaxed, he ordered his daughter to swallow his ejaculate and turned her over and began spanking her. He ordered her to leave, and she crawled down the stairs.
When Rachel Hamblin woke up, her cat Angus was in a box next to her bed. “I cried for a long time saying I was sorry,” she wrote in her Victims Statement.
This was the family that Rachel Hamblin was born into, a family that was respectable from the outside. David Lee Hamblin was a therapist with a Ph.D from the University of Arizona, working out of his home office in Provo. His wife Roselle was the daughter of lauded LDS scholar Richard Lloyd Anderson, a professor at BYU. Roselle’s mother Carma de Jong was a recognized expert on costume art, and the daughter of the first dean of BYU’s Fine Arts Department, Gerrit de Jong, Jr. David Hamblin’s parents were Robert Lee and June Adams, and June Adams had family real estate holdings throughout Provo in various shopping centers and apartment and condominium complexes.
On the outside, the Hamblins and Andersons were respectable, even upstanding, families within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Behind the closed doors of their homes and the homes of their friends and family members within the CS, they were monstrous in their capacity for sadism and abuse. Rachel Hamblin and her sisters detail a systematic abuse that occurred on a daily basis at the hands of their parents, their extended family, and the friends and associates of their parents who were allowed to pay to rape Rachel, Eliza, Katie, and Miriam Hamblin for decades.
Craig Christensen was allowed to rape his nieces at CS ordinances, and so was his wife Susan Elizabeth “Suki” Hamblin. Over hundreds of pages worth of Victims’ Statements, Rachel and her sisters detail on 46 separate pages the criminal conduct of Craig and Suki Christensen, including child rape, sodomy, and child murder.
To understand the evil of the CS and how it connects with Craig and Susan Christensen, a reader must look to the past to understand who Craig and Susan Christensen are.
The Who, the What, the When, the Where, and Why: An Origin Story
Evil doesn’t look evil. It looks ordinary, even pedestrian. Craig Christensen and his wife Suki do not radiate waves of evil energy in person or from afar in the various photographs that populate social media accounts. In their smiling headshots for Craig Christensen’s campaign, Craig and Suki Christensen look like any other middle aged couple.
Craig Roy Christensen had an ordinary upbringing as the son Ray Edward Christensen, albeit one that involved a great deal of travel as the son of an Air Force officer. The family was stationed in California, Alabama, Texas, Libya, Nebraska, D.C., Arizona, Alaska, Nevada, and ended up in Spring City, where Ray Edward Christensen eventually retired. Ray and his wife Marilyn raised seven children: Clarke Ray, Raelynn Ferguson, Collete Thompson, Craig Roy, Camille, Cory Rand, and Chad Ryan Christensen.
Craig was a typical military brat, but his father had retired by the time Craig was wrapping up high school in Tucson, Arizona at Santa Rita High School.
Susan “Suki” Christensen grew up in Tucson and Provo, and she appears in a rather amusing article covering the February 1974 toilet papering of her family’s home in Tucson.
Suki went on to achieve some notoriety as a junior tennis player in Utah, with her exploits meriting coverage in the August 12, 1976 edition of the Orem Geneva Times, as she won the 14 and under girls doubles match. By 1977, she was winning Junior League titles with her team in Provo. Suki Hamblin looked like a thousand other Mormon girls, fresh faced and blonde, her family home in Arizona covered with miles of toilet paper with the family’s Volkswagen and BMW parked in the driveway. In 1980, The Daily Herald chronicled Suki’s selection for the “America’s Witness for Christ” pageant in Palmyra, New York.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F60199001-3e56-47a8-b1b9-25c32ab84f51_1398x1545.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0cc0f98d-81d9-406b-83e7-1a9a0129bcaa_1417x1435.jpeg)
Nothing would indicate that Suki Hamblin or her future husband Craig Christensen were part of a multigenerational cult which steeped its children in physical and sexual abuse from the time they were born into adulthood. Nothing more harmless than toilet papering yards could be attributed to Suki or Craig Christensen in their youthful years.
The only public overlap between Suki and her in laws prior to the explosive allegations made by Suki’s nieces Rachel, Eliza, and Katie Hamblin was an innocuous 1978 article detailing the Christmas party at Dr. Richard Lloyd Anderson’s house, where Suki and her brother Steven formed a quartet with David and Roselle Hamblin to perform Christmas music and “lead the guests in some rounds and special numbers.” Without the context of Rachel and her sisters’ Victims Statements, one might have dismissed the announcement as simply the write up of a simple Christmas party involving Suki Hamblin, her brothers Steven and David, and her in-laws the Andersons.
The details were benign enough: Kira Pratt performed on an Irish harp, four members of the BYU A Capella Choir provided vocal accompaniment, and Roselle, David, Suki, and Steven Hamblin performed Christmas music and rounds and special numbers. There was no context in 1978 to read anything sinister into the details.
Rachel Hamblin and her sisters were forced to take harp lessons by their parents, allegedly because the harp held special significance to the CS as the instrument played by Lucifer. The Victims’ Statements filled out by Rachel and her sister detail “one eternal round” formed by a circle of bodies engaged in sexual acts consecrated to the Devil, and the story of Sinterklas, the Dutch version of St. Nicholas, would have its own significance to the CS.
Sinterklaas, the Dutch version of St. Nicholas, is assisted in his duties by Zwarte Piet, or Black Peter, who carries a bag of candy around in order to throw candy to children. One of the miracles attributed to St. Nicholas was the rescue of three young girls from prostitution, who he saved by tossing gold coins through the window of their family home in order to enable their father to afford dowries.
The Sunday evening festivities at the Anderson home were not written up in The Daily Herald until Wednesday, December 20, 1978. The significance may be lost on readers with general knowledge. December 20, 1978 is the Yule on the pagan and Wiccan calendars. Richard Lloyd Anderson and his wife could have timed their submission to the Daily Herald for a Sunday party to coincide with this date. There is no direct proof that they did, but the significance of the timing would have been obvious to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of pagan and Wiccan liturgical calendars.
Most importantly, the CS described by David Hamblin’s daughters took a particular delight in operating within plain sight. The members spoke in coded references that had an entirely separate meaning to CS members who were speaking in the presence of ordinary LDS faithful.
In public, the CS families and their children would have appeared to be ordinary LDS members, but they spoke in coded references to deceive their fellow LDS members. This coded form of communication was especially important during major milestones like births, baptisms, and other celebrations where the CS might be in mixed company with faithful LDS members.
The Hamblin clan was present at the Anderson home that Sunday evening in Provo, with David and Roselle Hamblin joining up with David’s sister Suki and his brother Steven to sing and perform. David and Roselle’s second wedding anniversary would have taken place on July 12, and Suki Hamblin would have been just 18 years of age. The setting and location would have been perfect for CS ordinances, as the Hamblins and the Andersons were both CS families dedicated to their secret faith.
Much like the father in the Sinterklaas legend, David Hamblin would become the father of three little girls, but Hamblin would force his daughters into lives as child prostitutes, and the stars of child pornography films with the stage name “The Three Graces.” Sinterklaas would not be showing up to rescue the Hamblin girls from the depravities of their parents. He would not appear to save the Hamblin girls from the abuse of their Uncle Craig and Aunt Suki, either.
The Crimes of Craig and Suki Christensen
Suki Christensen was devoted to her older brother David, according to her nieces Rachel, Eliza, and Katie. The Hamblin girls detail witnessing David and Suki involved in incestuous sexual liaisons, and the Hamblin children were forced to join in. Craig Christensen had his own sexual involvement with his brother in law David Lee Hamblin, which extended to anal sex in front of the Hamblin children.
The accusations against their aunt and uncle span 46 pages of the Hamblin Victims Statements, detailing physical, emotional, and sexual abuse. These crimes are detailed below.
Prince Charming Rapes
In Rachel Hamblin’s first Victim Statement, she details a series of rapes in Provo and New York where she was forced to role play as a polygamist princess while her father David, her Uncle Craig, and various other men played the part of Prince Charming. Rachel and her sisters were forced to have sex with these men as part of the role playing.
These rapes would have occurred between 1986 and 1991, which would place Rachel and her sister Eliza between the ages of three and eleven during the Prince Charming Rapes.
Ties that Bind: The Battle for Spring City
The Christensen family followed David Lee Hamblin and his wife Roselle around the country from Utah to Arizona to New York and back to Utah again.1
This claim is borne out by news reports which detail Craig Christensen’s civic involvement in Spring City with David and Roselle Hamblin, as well as Craig’s father Ray and David Hamblin’s father Robert. Craig Christensen’s family aligned with David Lee Hamblin’s family in a struggle for control over the present and the future of Spring City, as Ray Christensen, his wife Marilyn, and their in-law Robert Hamblin all mounted campaigns for offices at City Hall. On the other side of the struggle were the Allreds, the founding family of Spring City.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fba1ba4b6-ce64-49f0-8481-c32536d9f7b8_642x1904.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc1b86ed0-7945-421e-83ad-99d97aabaf4f_1956x3260.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fced86f0a-bba0-4e3b-b3a8-a6b1199de725_1971x3255.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F81a72640-1930-4ea4-a343-a9e723506c30_2075x3453.png)
According to Rachel Hamblin, the Allreds were the original CS family in Spring City, and they had founded the original CS Council in Spring City. David Hamblin and his family had disdain for the Allreds, characterizing the Allreds as inferior to the council founded by Hamblin, Joe Bennion, and Craig Christensen.
At the same time, David Hamblin and his family had contempt for Craig Christensen’s extended family as being a lower bloodline within the CS. Rachel Hamblin detailed how this sentiment was apparently shared by Craig Christensen.
The activities and futures of the families were intertwined, as Hamblin and his contingent within Spring City needed allies to wrest control from the Allreds and their allies. David Hamblin was young man in a hurry, and the Allred family was an entrenched group in Spring City. Ray Christensen, his wife Marilyn, and David Hamblin’s father Robert all lost their Spring City elections in 1997. David Lee Hamblin had been displaced from his position on the Planning and Zoning Commission by Mayor Allred, sparking a fight within the City Council and among the residents of Spring City.
The interlopers were bloodied but unbowed. They had been organizing and plotting for years to establish their United Order in Spring City, which would be ruled by Joe Bennion and David Lee Hamblin. Bennion and Hamblin had been mixing CS doctrines with the purportedly Native American principles taught by James Warren “Flaming Eagle” Mooney, a self-styled Indian medicine man who peddled peyote as a means of healing everything from trauma to addiction. David Lee Hamblin’s involvement with Mooney was the cause of controversy within the CS, as Hamblin’s father in law Richard Lloyd Anderson was enraged by what he saw as Hamblin’s increasingly reckless and arrogant behavior. Anderson feared that his son-in-law’s conduct would inevitably result in the exposure of the CS.
David Lee Hamblin wasn’t content to wait his turn in Provo under the eye of his father in law. He was building a fiefdom in Spring City, where he could conduct his own peculiar interpretations of CS doctrine and practices into a new application.
Craig Christensen was insulated from scrutiny largely because David Lee Hamblin kept drawing all attention to himself. He and his wife were content to follow along in David Lee Hamblin’s slipstream, traveling where Hamblin went, but maintaining just enough distance to avoid imploding with Hamblin. David Hamblin had two things to commend him to Craig and Suki Christensen: the first was his magnetism, which prompted an almost slavish devotion from his sisters Suki and Krii; the second was his seeming ability to control his own children and impose obedience on the children of other CS families which compelled those children to accept the ritual abuse of their parents and others.
Hamblin didn’t necessarily object to the Allred’s ritual abuse per se; instead, he felt that ritual abuse was the purview of parents. This was likely due to Hamblin’s understanding that ritually abusing children outside of the CS whose parents were not complicit could result in negative attention and exposure. However, as Hamblin’s involvement with James Mooney and his use of peyote increased, his behavior showed a marked devolution.
Craig and Suki Christensen’s Crimes in Detail
Craig and Suki were in the background at family events, in-home ceremonies, and they were at the forefront in the public battles between the Hamblins and Allreds in Spring City. David Hamblin had made a business out of training CS families how to manage their children for the purposes of compliance with ritual abuse. While Hamblin headed over the edge in his private and public life, Craig and Suki Christensen stayed far enough behind him to avoid being hit by the blowback.
Craig Christensen was a businessman, a Harvard educated MBA who worked for FranklinCovey. The Hamblin Victims Statements detail a man who was deeply involved with the CS, but not so involved with David Lee Hamblin’s evolution into an Indian medicine man.
The Christensen’s involvement with the normal rites of the CS were extreme in their own right. Rachel Hamblin detailed a Resurrection and Triumph CS ceremony in 1996 or 1997 which involved the torture and sacrifice of a young polygamist boy. Joe Bennion and Steve Hamblin carried out the torture of the boy, which consisted of skinning him while he was alive, and eventually skinning his penis.2 According to Rachel Hamblin, Joe Bennion tried to dig out the boy’s eyes with a knife, and Steve Hamblin slit the boy’s throat shortly afterwards. Craig and Suki Christensen were present and participating, and Craig Christensen posed for a photo with the dead boy’s decapitated corpse, placing his head where the boy’s head would have been. Rachel Hamblin accused her Aunt Suki of forcing her to perform oral sex on her as well.
If true, this would constitute first degree murder, kidnapping, rape, and trafficking. The boy was sexually abused during the ceremony, as one of the minor females in attendance was forced to climb on top of him and have sex with him. Those who were present would also be liable for each of the crimes as well, because they had foreknowledge of the purpose of the ceremony and participated in the murder of the boy.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F05c74e50-ff65-451a-8b28-dd98206fbfe8_2105x1090.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F42ba4a46-c259-4995-9f61-b0588fde7761_1911x1343.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F631ac639-326e-4c56-9c27-0201a898496c_1853x751.png)
In addition, Rachel Hamblin alleged that Craig and Suki Christensen assisted her parents in the production of child pornography that featured Rachel and her sisters Eliza and Katie as “The Three Graces.” Rachel was Faith, Eliza was Hope, and Katie was Charity. Their younger sister Miriam would later become Joy. Most of the child pornography films were allegedly shot by Brian Capener, an LDS filmmaker and artist.
Rachel’s allegations constitute any number of felonies ranging from unlawful sexual activity with a minor to rape and aggravated sexual assault, and her Uncle Craig and Aunt Suki Christensen are named offenders within her Victim’s Statement and the statements given by her sisters.
In her first Victim Statement, Rachel Hamblin details being forced to perform oral sex on her Aunt Suki in New York between the ages of 5 and 7. Shortly after Rachel Hamblin’s first period, she claimed that she was gang raped at a CS Fertility Ceremony while her Aunt Suki watched. Craig Christensen was one of the men participating in the gang rape.
At a CS Endowment ceremony that followed the gang rape, Rachel Hamblin was again gang raped by the men who were present, and her Aunt Suki Christensen performed oral sex on her afterwards.
The Hamblin girls also detail the murder of a hitchhiker at a CS camping trip on the Arizona-Utah border, and Craig and Suki Christensen are named as participants in the rape, torture, and eventual murder of the hitchhiker. According to Rachel Hamblin and her sisters, the CS would frequently task its members with the obligation to procure a victim for sacrifices on the camping trips. On that particular trip, the responsibility for procuring a person to serve a sacrifice fell to David Lee Hamblin.
This would place the Christensens at the scene of yet another murder, and it would inculpate them in a homicide that they participated in directly. Suki Christensen was one of the CS women who raped the hitchhiker before his murder. Eliza Hamblin’s VS 4 corroborated her sister’s allegations with respect to this crime.
Conclusion
Although the Provo Police Department and the Utah County Sheriff’s had the Hamblin Victims’ Statements between 2012 and 2014, as well as afterwards, there is no evidence to suggest that they questioned Craig or Suki Christensen about the allegations against them. There is no record of the police or the Utah County Attorneys Office following up with any of the other names within Hamblin Victims Statements.
Although law enforcement and prosecutors had a recorded apology from David Lee Hamblin to his daughter for raping her, prosecutors dropped the charges against David Hamblin in 2014. No other charges were brought against David Lee Hamblin’s alleged accomplices, whose names fill five single spaced pages in an index of the Hamblin Victim’s Statements made by IRA.
Today, Craig Christensen is a successful businessman with multiple rental properties across Provo. He sold his company Kraftworx to his former employer FranklinCovey, and he now spends his time as Chairman of the Board for the nonprofit Conserve Utah Valley. He’s running for District One, Provo City Council, and he is mounting his campaign despite the fact that his brother in law David Lee Hamblin is current facing two separate criminal trials for raping two children. If the allegations made by his nieces are true, Craig Christensen was David Lee Hamblin’s accomplice in an array of crimes ranging from child rape to the production of child pornography and even murder.
The average voter in Provo likely has no idea what Craig Christensen was accused of doing by his own nieces. IRA intends to change that. We’ve previously donated three campaign ads to the Christensen campaign detailing his involvement in the alleged abuse of his nieces. Share this article and those videos far and wide. Tomorrow, David Lee Hamblin will be facing his next status hearing in American Fork. IRA will cover that hearing.
We’re on TikTok, Instagram, Rumble, and Facebook. If you want to support our work exposing the Hamblin ring’s ritual abuse, you can subscribe. We also take donations via Stripe and CashApp. If you have tips, hit us on Telegram at @Goel1830 or on Signal at Goel. You can email us at 1830goel@gmail.com.
Below is a spreadsheet indexing the Hamblin Victims Statements referenced within this article with respect to Craig and Suki Christensen. If you know people in Provo, share this article with them and share the videos referenced at TikTok, Instagram, and Rumble, which are hyperlinked in the preceding paragraphs. As always, thanks for reading, and thanks for the support. Sunlight and mockery are the best disinfectants to the corruption of groups like the LDS Church of Satan, and IRA remains committed to using both to maximum effect until David Lee Hamblin and his accomplices are prosecuted, convicted, and incarcerated for their crimes.
VS 1 pg. 38, VS 3 pp. 17-20, pg. 89, and VS 4 pg. 60 detail ongoing sexual contact between David Lee Hamblin and his sister Suki Christensen, often in front of the Hamblin children and other CS members and their children.
Katie Hamblin’s VS 3 corroborates this claim on pages 140-141, and also states that the boy’s body was dismembered and distributed in bags to CS members who wished to eat the parts at a later time. Craig and Suki Christensen allegedly took one of the bags with them.
Another absolute masterpiece! Keep exposing these purveyors of darkness to the sanitizing sunlight of truth!
I think it's worth taking a little closer look at the "canned" newspaper article submission highlighting the Christmas party and music festivities at BYU professor and alleged CS High Council member, Richard Lloyd Anderson's home. I believe there are some details that make this event even more significant to the story and illustrate the same patterns seen throughout the Hamblin documents.
The article mentions Kira Pratt and the "hand-made Irish harp" gifted to her by her father. Kira's father was Samuel Orson Pratt - the Great Grandson of original LDS Apostle Parley P Pratt. Kira's mother, Louise Frandsen Pratt was an accomplished Harpist who would become 1st Harpist in the Utah Symphony. Samuel also played the flute as a member of the Utah Symphony.
https://www.maglebymortuary.com/obituaries/ida-pratt
The Provo Daily Herald article references a "Mark Davis". He is the one who "sang for the group and played his drum". Within 5 months of this Christmas party, Kira and Mark Davis got married in the Manti Temple.
https://newspapers.lib.utah.edu/details?id=23938153&q=%22kira+pratt%22&rows=200&sort=date_tdt+asc%2Cparent_i+asc%2Cpage_i+asc
This is the same Mark Davis that is mentioned by Eliza Hamblin in VS4 as being present in the Native American Hamblin family ritual abuse ceremonies involving peyote in Spring City.
Kira Pratt's obituary reveals even deeper connections to individuals with direct ties to the Edgemont 14th Ward - a ward that has become infamous for its infestation of alleged CS members. The Edgemont neighborhood is where Craig Christensen currently lives and where many of his campaign signs litter the lawns of his supporters.
https://www.deseret.com/1997/7/9/19323619/death-kira-pratt-davis
Kira's father, Samuel O Pratt and mother Louise Frandsen Pratt divorced in 1964 after Samuel allegedly had an affair with harpist and co-worker, Rosalie Rebollo. Samuel would marry Rosalie shortly after his divorce from Louise.
http://astorybettertold.blogspot.com/2010/12/
Samuel Pratt died in June, 1985. Less than 2 years later, On April 22, 1987 Rosalie Rebollo Pratt got re-married to George H Mortimer (B: 1903), who was 30 years her senior. Rosalie left the home she had shared with Samuel Pratt in neighboring Orem, UT and moved to new husband George Harding Mortimer's home @ 3687 LITTLE ROCK LN PROVO, UT 84604 (Edgemont 14th Ward). George H Mortimer died Feb. 1998.
Francesca Rebollo Sborgi-Lawson (One of Rosalie's daughters and step sister to Kira Pratt) assumed ownership of her mother's Edgemont 14th ward home @ 3684 N LITTLEROCK TER PROVO, UT 84604 in 2004 according to county records. One of her neighbors was future husband and BYU professor, John Scott Lawson.
Francesca is also an accomplished harpist. She would play a special harp solo during Carma de Jong Anderson's memorial in Dec 2022.
The Hamblin daughters' incredible victim statements become more and more credible the deeper one looks into the alleged perpetrators histories. The patterns and connections are becoming impossible to deny.